|Year : 2022 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 99-113
Approach to painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Shraddha B Lumpatki1, Karakkattu V Kavitha2, Manas V Manohar3, Ambika G Unnikrishnan1
1 Department of Diabetology and Endocrinology, Chellaram Diabetes Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Podiatry, Chellaram Diabetes Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Chellaram Diabetes Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India
|Date of Submission||01-Apr-2022|
|Date of Decision||05-May-2022|
|Date of Acceptance||05-May-2022|
|Date of Web Publication||16-Jul-2022|
Ambika G Unnikrishnan
Department of Diabetology and Endocrinology, Chellaram Diabetes Institute, Lalani Quantum, NH-4, Bavdhan (Budruk), Pune - 411 021, Maharashtra
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is a commonly encountered problem by a physician and poses a major treatment challenge. Although poor glycemic control is considered to be a main cause for the development of peripheral neuropathy, the overall etiopathogenesis remains unclear and needs further research. There are various tools to assess the status of nerves, but PDPN being a subjective factor is often measured in terms of pain scores or pain scale looking at the intensity and the phenotype of pain. PDPN affects the individual's quality of life and daily living and often disturbs the sleep and mental health. The management of PDPN includes achieving good glycemic control, following foot care practices, including the use of appropriate footwear and treatment for pain relief. The treatment of choice varies from topical application to the pain relieving patches and use of drugs such as anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and opioids which have shown some beneficial effect. Interventional and regional anesthesia have also been tried for the treatment of PDPN. Surgical decompression has shown a favorable effect on pain relief. There are unmet needs in the therapeutic management of PDPN, as available drugs give acceptable pain relief in very few patients, and fear of side effects may limit full-dose treatment. Till date, no medicine is available to reverse neuropathy.
Keywords: Complications, diabetes mellitus, neuropathic pain, neuropathy, painful neuropathy
|How to cite this article:|
Lumpatki SB, Kavitha KV, Manohar MV, Unnikrishnan AG. Approach to painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Chron Diabetes Res Pract 2022;1:99-113
|How to cite this URL:|
Lumpatki SB, Kavitha KV, Manohar MV, Unnikrishnan AG. Approach to painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Chron Diabetes Res Pract [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 10];1:99-113. Available from: https://cdrpj.org//text.asp?2022/1/2/99/351236
| Introduction|| |
Painful limb is a commonly faced challenge and needs to be distinguished between musculoskeletal, vascular, and neurological cause. The focus of this article is limited to neuropathic pain associated with diabetes. Neuropathic pain occurs as a result of direct damage to the somatosensory nerves, worldwide the most common cause of it is diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Nearly 50% of individuals with long-standing diabetes suffer from peripheral neuropathy (PN) and about 7%–10% of newly diagnosed individuals with diabetes have neuropathy. The prevalence of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) among individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) is roughly about 10%–20% and in those with DPN is about 40%–50%.,, A study from Belgium reported the prevalence of PDPN as 14% among individual with diabetes, with higher number of cases being reported in subjects with type 2 diabetes than type 1. In another study, up to 25% of individuals having prediabetes had PN, and among them, up to 21% had neuropathic pain in a less severe form.
| Risk Factors|| |
Apart from the well-known risk factors of DPN, i.e., obesity, older age, cigarette smoking, duration of diabetes, and poor glycemic control (elevated HbA1c), the risk factors specific for PDPN include genotypic variants of voltage-gated sodium channels (NAV 1.7 mutations), nephropathy, and Vitamin D deficiency.,,,,, Studies have suggested changes in central nervous system (CNS) as conferring additional risk for PDPN.,,, However, these remains as association, without any hints of causation.
| Pathophysiology of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy|| |
Chronic hyperglycemia activates collateral pathways of glucose utilization in peripheral nerves [Figure 1]. End products of these pathways cause oxidative stress, release of inflammatory cytokines, and mitochondrial dysfunction. This leads to microvascular changes, nerve ischemia, and structural and functional alteration in peripheral nerve contributing to the onset and progression of DPN – painful or painless.
|Figure 1: Pathophysiology of DPN and PDPN. PDPN: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, DPN: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy|
Click here to view
To understand the pathogenesis, it is important to revisit the pain pathway as shown in [Figure 2]. Learning that, it is easy to understand the following theories and hypothesis related to the pathogenesis of PDPN.
|Figure 2: Revisiting the pain pathway. Any noxious stimulus releases inflammatory chemicals at the site which triggers the depolarization of nociceptors thus generating action potential. This action potential is carried by afferent nerves via DRG to dorsal|
horn of spinal cord, where nociceptive sensations are relayed in spinal cord to spinothalamic tract by release of glutamate and substance P. These chemicals transmit pain information through spinothalamic tract to thalamus then to cortex where pain is
interpreted and perceived. The afferent nerves and DRG are PNS, and Dorsal Horn onward, i.e., Spinal cord and brain are CNS. The afferent nerves A-delta (myelinated) and small unmyelinated C-fibers are mainly responsible for carrying nociceptive sensations.
Superficial sharp pricking pain is transmitted by A delta fibers and deep seated aching, burning, itching pain associated with hyperalgesia and allodynia is transmitted by Small unmyelinated C fibers. A alpha- carries limb proprioception, A-beta carries limb
proprioception, pressure and vibration. DRG: Dorsal root ganglion, CNS: Central nervous system, PNS: Peripheral nervous system
Click here to view
Microvascular blood flow
Increased blood flow due to structural and functional abnormalities in vasa-nervosum and arteriovenous shunting in epineural blood vessels causing elevated nerve epineural oxygen saturation has been considered to have a role in the pathogenesis of PDPN. Serum markers of angiogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor) and endothelial dysfunction (soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1) were found to be elevated in painful DPN and symptomatic DPN, respectively., Together, the aforesaid factors suggest that vascular abnormalities could contribute to diabetic neuropathy.
Insulin signaling pathway defects
Insulin contributes to proper neuronal function by increasing expression of neuromodulator proteins and peptides such as calcitonin gene-related peptide. Insulin deficiency is closely linked to mitochondrial dysfunction, altered neurochemical synthesis, reduced capacity of regeneration, growth, and repair, thus triggering neuronal dysfunction. There is a growing evidence that insulin deficiency in relatively euglycemic individuals can trigger DPN.,, Animal studies have shown an improvement in sensory and motor nerve conduction defects with a prevention of axonal atrophy with intrathecal delivery of insulin for 4 weeks, which was not observed with subcutaneous insulin. Local intraplantar (hindpaw) insulin delivery in experimental rats have shown to reverse loss of intraepidermal nerve fiber density and a slight decrease in DPN symptoms.
Neuromas and ectopic signals causing hyperexcitability
Initial low levels of oxidative stress due to hyperglycemia affects small nerve fibers; with increase in oxidative stress, there is an escalation in the stages of DPN.,, Damaged nerves regenerate by sprouting in all directions called neuromas which then cause pressure damage to the adjacent undamaged nerves and generate ectopic signals which affects the surrounding unaffected nerves and cell bodies of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) which is responsible for hyperexcited responses along with increased sensitivity to a given stimulus also called as peripheral sensitization. These increased signals alter the gate (described below in gate control theory) and are perceived as pain.
Role of dorsal root ganglion
DRG was once thought to be only a conduit between peripheral nervous system (PNS) and CNS. However, currently, DRG is considered to be a part of PNS and has a role in peripheral sensitization through expression of voltage-gated sodium channels and voltage-independent potassium channels. Voltage-gated calcium channels (Cav 3.2) have a role in allodynia.
Normally, A-delta and C-fibers are not directly connected to sympathetic nervous system, but nerve damage in periphery causes sympathetic sprouting in DRG and there occurs epinephrine-mediated transmission from one axon to another, which causes sympathetic sensory coupling and sympathetically mediated pain.,
Gate control theory
Transmission of impulse from PNS and CNS is gated at dorsal horn. A-delta and C-fibers (associated with pain stimulus) open the gate and A-beta (associated with touch/vibration/pressure) closes the gate. The final outcome depends on the input impulses that are generated in high numbers.
Transmission of pain signals at the dorsal horn is controlled by brainstem nuclei via the descending modulatory pathway. These may dampen or increase the pain signal. The inhibitory effect is caused by projecting serotonin or opioid, thus decreasing pain sensation. Exogenous opioids imitate endogenous opioids and antidepressants (especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs]) increasing availability of these neurotransmitters in the dorsal horn. In contrast, anxiety and fear influence this inhibitory mechanism; thus, cognitive behavioral therapy is helpful in pain management.
| Definition, Classification, and Clinical Manifestation|| |
PDPN is defined as “pain as a direct consequence of abnormalities in the peripheral somatosensory system in people with diabetes”.;, DPN has a varied range of presentation and it is classified depending on the pattern, fibers involved, and pain character. The classification system of typical (distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy [DSPN]) versus atypical (all other forms of DPN) as described by Thomas and Boulton is universally acceptable., Characteristics of both are described in [Table 1].,,,,,,,,,, When classifying on the basis of pain symptoms, DPN can have positive or negative symptoms, can be acute or chronic and can have different pain character as described in NPSI questionnaire [Figure 3].
|Figure 3: Characteristics of painful and nonpainful DPN. *Allodynia: Feeling of pain even on application of nonpainful stimulus.|
**Hyperalgesia: Increased sensitivity to painful stimulus. DPN: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Click here to view
| Acute Painful Neuritis|| |
Sudden tight glucose control in long-standing diabetes leads to small fiber neuropathy (SFN) manifesting in severe pain and paresthesia occurring in 6 months of rapid glucose control also called as treatment-induced neuropathy (insulin neuritis). Pain is generally more in the feet than the hands, symmetric in nature and length dependent, but few may report generalized pain, especially in type 1 diabetes. It is also associated with worsening of preexisting retinopathy and autonomic dysfunction, especially in type 1 diabetes. Pain is self-limiting and improves with slower glucose control.
Acute neuritis or polyneuropathy can occur following poor glycemic control with ketoacidosis, although it is a rare phenomenon but responds to good glycemic control.
Sometimes, there may be continuous unremitting burning pain as if walking on a hot sand with exacerbations at night with significant allodynia and hyperalgesia leading to hopelessness and depression. In worse cases, appetite is lost, which is associated with significant weight loss termed as diabetic neuropathic cachexia. Motor function remains intact, while mild sensory loss is noted, more for thermal than vibration. It is self-limiting and needs symptomatic treatment. Other causes of neuropathy with weight loss such as amyloidosis, heavy metal toxicity, Fabry's disease, and HIV should be excluded.
| Chronic Painful Diabetic Neuropathy|| |
It refers to painful neuropathy, which is going on for more than 6 months. DSPN, sensory and sensorimotor, is the most common presentation of chronic diabetic neuropathy, which can be painful or painless. It has length-dependent glove stocking pattern of involvement, i.e., pain reaches upto the knee first before fingers/hands are involved, in severe cases trunk is involved [Table 1]. Others forms of chronic painful diabetic neuropathy (CPDN) includes diabetic mononeuropathies or multiple mononeuropathies. The most common mononeuropathies are median neuropathy at the wrist and ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. In cranial mononeuropathies, third-nerve (oculomotor) palsy is the most common, followed by fourth (trochlear), seventh (facial), and sixth (abducens). Diabetic third-nerve palsies are characteristically pupil sparing. Multiple neuropathies refer to the involvement of two or more nerves. These nerves are involved sequentially or irregularly one after another. Another type of CPDN includes diabetic radiculoplexopathy, which typically presents with severe pain in the lower back, hip, and thigh in a unilateral manner. Atrophy and weakness of muscles (proximal more than distal) are apparent within a few days to weeks. Weakness usually progresses over several weeks to month and later there is slow recovery. Pain subsides before the motor symptoms improve, but there may be residual weakness, sensory loss, and pain. There may be coexisting DSPN in half of these individuals. Individuals with severe pain in acute stage have been treated with glucocorticoids, intravenous (IV) immunoglobulin, and cyclophosphamide therapy. PDPN is also associated with autonomic features such as postural hypotension, bowel/bladder incontinence, erectile dysfunction, abnormal sweating, and dryness of the skin. In the feet, excessive dryness leads to fissures, which can act as a portal of entry for the bacterial infection.
| Diagnosis|| |
Limb pain needs to be differentiated between neuropathic and non-neuropathic, neuropathic pain is associated with nerve distribution territory or dermatome, whereas non-neuropathic pain does not. Furthermore, non-diabetic causes [Table 2] should be ruled out wherever suspected. Pain in DPN is bilateral and symmetrical. It involves toes/ forefoot or entire foot ascending upward and worsens at night. Involvement of hands and trunk is seen in severe cases, sometimes causing disturbed sleep and tiredness during the daytime. Three highly sensitive symptoms indicating DPN are tingling, numbness, and increased pain on touch.
Before neurological examination, foot inspection should be carried out, looking for skin abnormalities, ulcers, cracks (fissures), callosities, nail abnormalities, infections, deformities (clawing of toes, hammer toe, Charcot foot, etc.) and identifying high-risk areas of ulceration, muscle wasting, and range of motion at joints. Vascular examination involves palpation of dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial arteries, assessing for temperature differences between the limbs, loss of hair, and assessment of ankle brachial index.
Neurological examination involves detailed assessment of various systems. In motor system examination, one should look for atrophy of small muscles of the feet, strength of dorsiflexors, and plantar flexors of the feet, toe, and fingers and to check for ankle reflexes, if it is reduced or absent. Large fiber sensory assessment includes vibration, position, light touch, and pressure sensations. Vibration assessment (A-alpha, A-beta fiber) is done using a 128-Hz tuning fork/biothesiometer. Biothesiometer has greater accuracy; if the vibration is not felt at >25 volts, it is termed to be abnormal. Position sense (A-beta fiber) of the great toe should be assessed by plantar flexion and dorsiflexion at metatarsophalangeal joint and interphalangeal joint with closed eyes. Light touch and pressure (A-beta fiber) is assessed with a 10-g Semmes–Weinstein monofilament; a 3-point check is considered to be effective than 10-point check. Test is abnormal if the patient does not perceive the touch and absence of protective sensation increases the risk of ulcer development. Small fiber sensory test includes pinprick and thermal sensation; pinprick (C fibers) is assessed using an instrument called “Neurotip,” which has a high specificity (88%) in ruling SFN. Temperature (A-delta fibers) assessment is done using glass tubes filled with hot and cold water or a simple tool called “Tip Therm.” It has high sensitivity (98%) especially for warm detection. Allodynia (denotes small fiber affliction) or pain on simple touch sensation is assessed using brush or cotton wisp, if the sensation is not perceived distally then the examination should be carried out proximally till the sensation is perceived to identify the area of involvement.
There are grades of certainties when diagnosing PN: possible, probable, and definite. When there are only symptoms or signs - it is a possible DPN, if symptoms and signs both are present- it is a probable DPN and if both symptoms and signs are present with confirmed diagnostic testing - it is a definite DPN.,, It is not always possible to conduct Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS) in clinical practice or it may be negative if small nerve fibers are involved hence for practical purposes probable neuropathic pain is enough for the diagnosis i.e., the presence of abnormal pin prick or decreased thermal perception and inability to detect vibration along with symptoms gives the diagnosis of DPN. As per the recommendation of American Diabetes Association (ADA), all the subjects with type 2 diabetes should be screened for DPN at the diagnosis and for type 1 diabetes after 5 years of diagnosis and annual screening thereafter.
Scores and scales
Scores for identifying the pain of neuropathic origin are Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaires, Leeds Assessment Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs scale, Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire, and IDentification Pain (ID Pain).,,, Scores to assess the severity of neuropathic pain and its interference with daily life or for the assessment of quality of life are Modified Brief Pain Inventory and the Patients Global Impression of Change scale (PGICS). The scoring systems are mainly used for research purposes. In clinical practice, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) or 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (11-point NRS) are used to grade the pain intensity. Among all the scores, DN4 questionnaire has a good sensitivity and specificity in identifying neuropathic pain, it can be used in routine clinical practice. It is a 10-point questionnaire with 7 sensory descriptors (burning, painful cold, electric shock like, tingling, pins and needles, numbness, and itching) and 3 clinical signs (touch hypoesthesia, pin prick hypoesthesia, pain provoked, or increased on brushing). Positive response to each carries 1 point and negative response 0 point. Scores ≥4/10 indicate neuropathic pain. For guiding the treatment, the NPSI Questionnaire is useful. In NPSI, symptoms are categorized as : a) spontaneous superficial pain-burning; b) spontaneous deep pain-squeezing, pressure like; c) Paroxysmal painful attacks-electric shock like or stabbing; d) evoked pain-pain provoked or increased by brushing, pressure, cold in the painful area and e) abnormal sensation (paresthesia/dysesthesia)-tingling or pins and needles. The PGICS measures responses from very much improved to very much worse. VAS and 11-point NRS are the linear scales where the patients can mark from no hurt to the worst possible hurt.
Laboratory test and imaging
DPN is a clinical diagnosis, radiological and laboratory testing is rarely needed. It should be carried out wherever applicable according to the differentials. The differentials for clinical diagnosis have been mentioned in [Table 2]. Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) should be tested to know the status of glycaemic control. Furthermore, it is important to obtain a fundus examination to look for associated diabetic retinopathy, normal fundus examination will not rule out DPN, but the presence of retinopathy will support the diagnosis.
Nerve conduction studies
This test is a highly sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of large fiber neuropathy, but it does not diagnose SFN, which can develop early in the course of disease. The typical finding in DSPN is reduced or absent sensory nerve action potential from predominant axonal loss mainly in the legs. With disease progression, compound motor action potentials are also reduced and abnormalities may be observed in hands too, thus reflecting length-dependent degeneration of large myelinated nerve fiber. Nerve conduction velocities are normal or only mildly delayed, if it is <70% of lower normal limit, or if the conduction block is present, there is superimposed peripheral nerve demyelination.
It is performed to distinguish neuropathic from myopathic processes, especially when there is motor involvement. It is performed in distal muscles in entrapment neuropathy, in proximal muscles in amyotrophy, and in paraspinal and limb muscles in suspected radiculopathy.
Bedside quantitative sensory testing
This is used to detect both small and large fiber affection. It has seven components, i.e., thermal non- painful perception, touch sensation (dynamic and static mechanical detection), mechanical pain sensitivity, wind up, dynamic mechanical allodynia, pressure pain sensitivity, and vibration perception.
Intraepidermal nerve fiber density
It is an invasive procedure (involves skin biopsy) that is not done routinely in a clinical practice. It is more sensitive than NCS or sural nerve biopsy in diagnosing SFN.
There are three major approaches to the treatment of PDPN. The only approach which slows down the progression of DPN and the associated pain is tight glycemic control. The other two are pathogenesis-based treatment and symptomatic pain management.
Reduction in HbA1c can improve SNF function, nerve conduction, and vibration threshold abnormalities. The HbA1c goal is <7% for most DPN patients, but the risk of hypoglycemia and complications should be taken into account before tight glucose control. In Type 1 diabetes, studies have shown the role of intensive glucose control in both primary and secondary prevention of PDPN. In type 2 diabetes, poor glycemic control is certainly a risk factor for PDPN, but intensive glycemic control has shown only modest but statistically significant benefit for secondary prevention of PDPN. The reasons for this probably could be dyslipidemia, obesity, and cardiovascular complications associated with type 2 diabetes, which by themselves are independent risk factors for PDPN. In DCCT Trial, tight glucose control using daily basal, 3-4 bolus injections, or insulin pump has shown a superior result with 64% decrease in neuropathy over a period of 5 years as compared with twice daily combination of intermediate acting and rapid acting insulin. A study showed that treatment with insulin-sensitizing drugs in Type 2 DM has got less incidence of DPN compared to insulin-providing treatment.
Treatment based on pathogenetic mechanism
- Pancreatic transplantation: It has shown reversal of neuropathy and improvement in neurophysiological parameters.,, However, such benefits take around 10 years after transplantation. Due to complexity of procedure, the lesser invasive option of islet cell transplantation has been suggested in type 1 diabetes and it has shown a marked improvement in neurophysiology
- α-Lipoic acid: It is an antioxidant licensed to treat symptomatic DSPN. Clinical improvement is seen with IV 600 mg/day over 3 weeks in a meta-analysis with 4 randomized control trials (RCTs). However, another RCT showed no improvement in neuropathy. Hence, efficacy is uncertain
- Benfotiamine (B1)/Methylcobalamine (B12)/Pyridoxine (B6): BEDIP study with B1 200 mg once daily for 3 weeks and BENDIP with B1 300 mg and 600 mg once daily for 6 weeks showed subjective pain relief. B1 with B6/B12 combination for 12 weeks improved nerve conduction and vibration perception in peroneal nerve
- Aldose reductase inhibitors: Epalrestat (50 mg thrice daily) treatment is associated with improvement in nerve conduction as well as symptoms however side effects such as hepatic dysfunction and gastrointestinal adverse effects have to be considered
- Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor: In a large RCT (DEMAND Study), delapril was shown to significantly reduce the progression of neuropathy compared to placebo
- Control of dyslipidemia and hypertriglyceridemia: Lipid-lowering agents like HMG Co-A reductase inhibitors have neuroprotective effects. Lowering triglycerides with diet and exercise have shown to increase IENFD in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and fenofibrate was shown to reduce amputations in the FIELD study.,
Symptomatic pain management
There are three treatment options that are approved by the FDA for the treatment of painful PDPN i.e., duloxetine, pregabalin, and tapentadol ER extended release. In painful DPN, monotherapy is not a rule and 100% pain relief is not always a reachable goal. Even 30% reduction in pain intensity from baseline is considered meaningful. Various medications that have shown significant pain relief with tolerable side effects are used in practice [Table 3].,,, It is important for clinicians to gain an overview about mechanism of pain and possible treatment options [Figure 4].
|Table 3: Pharmacological treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy-dosage|
Click here to view
For clinical use pregabalin is preferred over gabapentin which is a FDA approved because of higher quality studies available on effects, predictable pharmacokinetics, shorter titration period, and improves numerous quality of life measures. Gabapentin nonetheless has few drug interactions, less expensive and improves mental health and vitals. Prominent side effects includes somnolence, dizziness, peripheral edema, headache, xerostomia, and constipation. These drugs do not generally have addiction potential, but both pregabalin and gabapentin should be avoided in people with a history of substance abuse disorder; both agents can have side effects if used concomitantly with other psychoactive agents.
Serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor
Duloxetine is FDA approved drug. Major side effect is nausea. Other less common but serious side effects are hepatotoxicity, orthostatic hypotension, falls and syncope, serotonin syndrome, abnormal bleeding, severe skin reactions, mania, angle closure glaucoma, hyponatremia, seizures, urinary hesitancy, and retention.
This includes amitriptyline, nortriptyline, and desipramine. Major side effects are dry mouth, urinary retention, orthostasis, insomnia, fatigue, headache, and dizziness. Anticholinergic side effects can be lowered by slow titration or using secondary amines. These agents should be used with caution in patients with ischemic heart disease and ventricular conduction abnormalities. All patients above 40 years should get an electrocardiogram done before starting on these agents.
Tramadol and tapentadol (ER) are the agents used to treat PDPN. Major side effects are constipation, nausea, drowsiness. These agents are used only as second-line drugs in people whose pain is severe not controlled with first-line agents and requiring opioids daily round-the-clock. Serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRIs) such as venlafaxine can be used as a second-line agent. Major side effects are nausea; however, the drug can also cause cardiac conduction abnormality and hypertension., These are obvious factors limiting the drug use. Venlafaxine causes withdrawal symptoms when stopped immediately; hence, it is advised to taper down the medicine slowly.
Five percent lidocaine-acts by stabilizing neuronal membrane via inhibiting fast voltage-gated sodium channels. In general, one patch is applied daily with a maximum limit of 3 patches per day. Capsaicin 0.075%-acts by Transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1) desensitization and also by depleting substance P., It is applied 4 times daily. Isosorbide dinitrate spray-acts by dilatation of endoneurial blood vessels; the dose is 30 mg daily applied at the bottom of the feet.
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
Citalopram and paroxetine are the agents used from this class. Dose ranges from 10 to 40 mg daily.,
Oxycodone and morphine sulfate are the agents used. Dose range for oxycodone is 10–40 mg twice daily (maximum dose is 120 mg) and for morphine sulfate is 15–30 mg, 12-24 hourly. Major side effects are constipation, nausea, and sedation.
Valproate, topiramate, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine and lacosamide are not recommended for treatment of PDPN.,
As a conclusion to this section, pregabalin, gabapentin, duloxetine and amitriptyline have level A evidence for first-line treatment of PDPN.,,,,, SNRIs such as venlafaxine, opioid-like medication-tramadol and tapentadol (ER) also have level A evidence for second-line treatment of PDPN.,,,,,, Topical treatment like lidocaine patch 5% or Capsaicin 0.075% cream have Level B evidence for second-line treatment of PDPN.,,,, Finally, SSRIs like citalopram, paroxetine, ecitalopram and opioids-oxycodone controlled release may be used ideally, only as next line therapies.,,,,
Additional Evidence From Clinical Trials
This section will help in choosing the agents based on the evidence from clinical trial. Trial conducted by Wernicke and colleague suggests that the appropriate dose of duloxetine is 60 mg once a day. In a meta-analysis, comparing duloxetine and pregabalin, pregabalin showed a marginal improvement over duloxetine, Duloxetine and amitriptyline also had a comparable efficacy.,, In a trial by Max et al., amitriptyline and desipramine showed comparable pain relief. In various studies, amitriptyline was compared with pregabalin, duloxetine and gabapentin taken together these studies showed pregabalin to be superior and duloxetine and gabapentin having comparable efficacy.,, Algorithm used in clinical practice for the management of PDPN is shown in [Figure 5]. Consensus guidelines by Argoff et al., recommends duloxetine as the first choice followed by pregabalin, tricyclic antidepressant (TCAs), and oxycodone (CR). The American Association of Neurology (AAN) guidelines recommend use of pregabalin as the first-line therapy with level A recommendation. Gabapentin, amitriptyline, venlafaxine, duloxetine, sodium valproate are the second-line agents with level B recommendation. Use of dextromethorphan, oxycodone, morphine sulfate, and tramadol has got level B recommendation and to be used after failure of response to anticonvulsants and antidepressants. The AAN guidelines recommend against the use of oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, and lacosamide (level B). Preference to medications depends on the comorbidities and contraindications [Table 4] as per the Toronto Consensus Panel on Diabetic Neuropathy. There are some additional benefits with individual agent along with pain relief. For example- duloxetine and TCAs may be chosen for PDPN with depression, duloxetine and pregabalin for generalised anxiety disorder and duloxetine, Pregabalin, TCAs and opioids for PDPN with insomnia. The dose of appropriate and effective medication chosen should be titrated according to the efficacy and side effects. Lack of efficacy should be stated only after 2–4 weeks of trial using adequate dosage. A practical approach to the management of DPN is summarized in [Figure 5].
|Figure 5: Practical approach to the management of DPN. DPN: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy|
Click here to view
|Table 4: Selected contraindications to pharmacotherapy in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy|
Click here to view
Combination versus Monotherapy of pregaBalin and dulOxetine in Diabetic Neuropathy study (COMBO-DN) is one such study, where the responses to treatment in subgroups based on sensory profiles were prospectively assessed with initial monotherapy and then combination therapy of duloxetine and pregabalin. The data suggest that if there is insufficient pain relief after 8 weeks treatment of 60 mg/d of duloxetine, patients might benefit from combination treatment by adding 300 mg/d of pregabalin especially if they have high intensity pressing pain and evoked pain. However, it is possible that maximizing therapy with duloxetine to 120 mg/d might be helpful in patients having paresthesia and dysesthesia. In contrast, patients who are started on pregabalin initially with 300 mg/d, adding 60 mg/d duloxetine in case of nonresponse led to numerically higher decrease in NPSI dimensions/items compared to maximizing the pregabalin dose to 600 mg/d. Furthermore, it was suggested that this combination therapy works better in mild–moderate pain; in severe pain, maximizing monotherapy has greater benefit (but this finding was not statistically significant). Several other studies have relied on clustering of clinical features for selecting phenotypes responding to drugs, but no clear evidence has emerged.,,
It has been tried in refractory cases. It is evident from autopsies of diabetic neuropathy patients that the nerves affected were 50% larger in cross-sectional area with significant edema and thus vulnerable to compression at anatomical tunnels such as carpal tunnel and tarsal tunnel. This can cause pain, which could also be a glove stocking distribution type. This compression initiates a cascade of pathology causing subperineural and endoneural oedema which leads to impaired blood nerve barrier. Thus causing connective tissue changes leading to perineural thickening and a cascade of demyelination and degeneration. Hence, decompression surgeries have shown effect on not just pain relief but significant prevention of foot ulcers and amputation. However, this procedure has limited benefit except in some specific situations; moreover, patients often do not wish for an invasive therapy.
There are several nonpharmacological approaches such as foot care, lifestyle interventions (weight loss, alcohol, and smoking cessation), exercise or balance training, physical therapy, and cognitive-behavioral therapy.
Electrical nerve stimulation-transcutaneous and percutaneous : it can be started anytime as an adjunct to pharmacological treatment and may reduce the need for oral nonopioid analgesic medication.,
Spinal cord stimulation
It is one of the emerging options. A randomized control trial showed that 10-kHz spinal cord stimulation relieves pain without exacerbating underlying paresthesia and thus can be considered in cases of inadequate pain relief. DRG stimulation/neuromodulation has also shown a promising result in refractory PDPN.
Monochromatic infrared energy (MIRE)
It was approved by the FDA in 1994 to increase circulation and reduce pain. Symptomatic reversal of DPN was reported with the use of noninvasive MIRE device. An RCT showed 50% improvement in sensation in subjects who had not progressed to profound sensory loss and decreased symptoms among those with loss of protective sensation after 6–12 active treatments.
There are other pharmacological options which are under trial: (a) Xenon402 (Nav1.7 blocker), a peripherally acting Na(v)1.7 sodium channel blocker (b) EMA401 (a novel AT2R antagonist), an orally administered highly selective angiotensin II type 2 receptor antagonist, as a novel treatment for postherpetic neuralgia, which is being explored in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial and (c) Ziconotide (N Type calcium channel inhibitor), an FDA-approved treatment for reducing allodynia, though intrathecal route of administration limits its use.
Any lower limb pain in an individual with diabetes should be differentiated between neuropathic and nonneuropathic pain. Probable diagnosis of PDPN is made if both symptoms and signs are present in the same dermatomal distribution. Examination by bedside QST and/or NCS confirm the diagnosis. Better glucose control and use of pregabalin or duloxetine can help relieve the symptoms. Gabapentin and amitriptyline may also be used as first-line agents. Opioid-like drugs and topical treatments are used as second-line agents. Nonpharmacological measures include foot care and lifestyle management. Other therapies like electrical nerve and spinal cord/DRG stimulation have shown some benefits in pain relief. There is a need for further research to better understand the pathogenesis and the management to halt the progression or reverse the neuropathy.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Chong MS, Hester J. Diabetic painful neuropathy: Current and future treatment options. Drugs 2007;67:569-85.
Bansal V, Kalita J, Misra UK. Diabetic neuropathy. Postgrad Med J 2006;82:95-100.
Apfel SC, Asbury AK, Bril V, Burns TM, Campbell JN, Chalk CH, et al.
Positive neuropathic sensory symptoms as endpoints in diabetic neuropathy trials. J Neurol Sci 2001;189:3-5.
Abbott CA, Malik RA, van Ross ER, Kulkarni J, Boulton AJ. Prevalence and characteristics of painful diabetic neuropathy in a large community-based diabetic population in the U.K. Diabetes Care 2011;34:2220-4.
Veves A, Backonja M, Malik RA. Painful diabetic neuropathy: Epidemiology, natural history, early diagnosis, and treatment options. Pain Med 2008;9:660-74.
Van Acker K, Bouhassira D, De Bacquer D, Weiss S, Matthys K, Raemen H, et al.
Prevalence and impact on quality of life of peripheral neuropathy with or without neuropathic pain in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients attending hospital outpatients clinics. Diabetes Metab 2009;35:206-13.
Papanas N, Vinik AI, Ziegler D. Neuropathy in prediabetes: Does the clock start ticking early? Nat Rev Endocrinol 2011;7:682-90.
Spallone V, Greco C. Painful and painless diabetic neuropathy: One disease or two? Curr Diab Rep 2013;13:533-49.
Themistocleous AC, Ramirez JD, Shillo PR, Lees JG, Selvarajah D, Orengo C, et al.
The Pain in Neuropathy Study (PiNS): A cross-sectional observational study determining the somatosensory phenotype of painful and painless diabetic neuropathy. Pain 2016;157:1132-45.
Truini A, Spallone V, Morganti R, Tamburin S, Zanette G, Schenone A, et al.
A cross-sectional study investigating frequency and features of definitely diagnosed diabetic painful polyneuropathy. Pain 2018;159:2658-66.
Prabodha LB, Sirisena ND, Dissanayake VH. Susceptible and prognostic genetic factors associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A comprehensive literature review. Int J Endocrinol 2018;2018:8641942.
Pai YW, Lin CH, Lee IT, Chang MH. Prevalence and biochemical risk factors of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with or without neuropathic pain in Taiwanese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2018;12:111-6.
Esteghamati A, Fotouhi A, Faghihi-Kashani S, Hafezi-Nejad N, Heidari B, Sheikhbahaei S, et al.
Non-linear contribution of serum vitamin D to symptomatic diabetic neuropathy: A case-control study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2016;111:44-50.
Marshall AG, Lee-Kubli C, Azmi S, Zhang M, Ferdousi M, Mixcoatl-Zecuatl T, et al.
Spinal disinhibition in experimental and clinical painful diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes 2017;66:1380-90.
Selvarajah D, Heiberg-Gibbons F, Wilkinson ID, Gandhi R, Tesfaye S. A magnetic resonance imaging volumetry study of regional brain atrophy in diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Diabetes 2018;67 Suppl 1:550-P.
Cauda F, Sacco K, D'Agata F, Duca S, Cocito D, Geminiani G, et al.
Low-frequency BOLD fluctuations demonstrate altered thalamocortical connectivity in diabetic neuropathic pain. BMC Neurosci 2009;10:138.
Greig M, Wilkinson ID, Shillo P, Selvarajah D, Gandhi R, Tesfaye S. Impaired hemodynamic response to thermal pain in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes 2018;67 Suppl 1:568-P.
Rosenberger DC, Blechschmidt V, Timmerman H, Wolff A, Treede RD. Challenges of neuropathic pain: Focus on diabetic neuropathy. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2020;127:589-624.
Doupis J, Lyons TE, Wu S, Gnardellis C, Dinh T, Veves A. Microvascular reactivity and inflammatory cytokines in painful and painless peripheral diabetic neuropathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:2157-63.
Deguchi T, Hashiguchi T, Horinouchi S, Uto T, Oku H, Kimura K, et al.
Serum VEGF increases in diabetic polyneuropathy, particularly in the neurologically active symptomatic stage. Diabet Med 2009;26:247-52.
Murakawa Y, Zhang W, Pierson CR, Brismar T, Ostenson CG, Efendic S, et al.
Impaired glucose tolerance and insulinopenia in the GK-rat causes peripheral neuropathy. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2002;18:473-83.
Romanovsky D, Wang J, Al-Chaer ED, Stimers JR, Dobretsov M. Comparison of metabolic and neuropathy profiles of rats with streptozotocin-induced overt and moderate insulinopenia. Neuroscience 2010;170:337-47.
Grote CW, Wright DE. A role for insulin in diabetic neuropathy. Front Neurosci 2016;10:581.
Brussee V, Cunningham FA, Zochodne DW. Direct insulin signaling of neurons reverses diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes 2004;53:1824-30.
Guo G, Kan M, Martinez JA, Zochodne DW. Local insulin and the rapid regrowth of diabetic epidermal axons. Neurobiol Dis 2011;43:414-21.
Itabashi C, Mizukami H, Osonoi S, Takahashi K, Kudo K, Wada K, et al.
Normal high HbA1c a risk factor for abnormal pain threshold in the Japanese population. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2019;10:651.
Kudoh K, Mizukami H, Itabashi C, Fuke N, Osonoi S, Takeuchi Y, et al.
Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein is a distinctive biomarker of abnormal pain threshold in the general Japanese population. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2020;8:e001739.
Osonoi S, Mizukami H, Itabashi C, Wada K, Kudoh K, Igawa A, et al.
Increased oxidative stress underlies abnormal pain threshold in a normoglycemic Japanese population. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:E8306.
Devor M, Lomazov P, Matzner O. Sodium channel accumulation in injured axons as a substrate for neuropathic pain. In: Boivie J, Hansson P, Lindblom U, editors. Touch, Temperature and Pain in Health and Disease: Mechanisms and Assessments. Seattle, Wash, USA: IASP Press; 1994. p. 207-30.
Study RE, Kral MG. Spontaneous action potential activity in isolated dorsal root ganglion neurons from rats with a painful neuropathy. Pain 1996;65:235-42.
Cummins TR, Aglieco F, Renganathan M, Herzog RI, Dib-Hajj SD, Waxman SG. Nav1.3 sodium channels: Rapid repriming and slow closed-state inactivation display quantitative differences after expression in a mammalian cell line and in spinal sensory neurons. J Neurosci 2001;21:5952-61.
Matthews EA, Dickenson AH. Effects of spinally delivered N- and P-type voltage-dependent calcium channel antagonists on dorsal horn neuronal responses in a rat model of neuropathy. Pain 2001;92:235-46.
Jänig W, Levine JD, Michaelis M. Interactions of sympathetic and primary afferent neurons following nerve injury and tissue trauma. Prog Brain Res 1996;113:161-84.
Kanno T, Yaguchi T, Nishizaki T. Noradrenaline stimulates ATP release from DRG neurons by targeting beta(3) adrenoceptors as a factor of neuropathic pain. J Cell Physiol 2010;224:345-51.
Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Science 1965;150:971-9.
Otis JD, Sanderson K, Hardway C, Pincus M, Tun C, Soumekh S. A randomized controlled pilot study of a cognitive-behavioral therapy approach for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Pain 2013;14:475-82.
Tesfaye S, Boulton AJ, Dyck PJ, Freeman R, Horowitz M, Kempler P, et al
. Diabetic neuropathies: Update on definitions, diagnostic criteria, estimation of severity, and treatments. Diabetes Care 2010;33:2285-93.
Jensen TS, Baron R, Haanpaa M, Kalso E, Loeser JD, Rice AS, et al
. A new definition of neuropathic pain. Pain 2011;152:2204-5.
Thomas PK. Classification, differential diagnosis, and staging of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Diabetes 1997;46 Suppl 2:S54-7.
Boulton AJ, Vinik AI, Arezzo JC, Bril V, Feldman EL, Freeman R, et al.
Diabetic neuropathies: A statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2005;28:956-62.
American Diabetes Association. 11. Microvascular complications and foot care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care 2021;44:S151-67.
Dyck PJ, Davies JL, Wilson DM, Service FJ, Melton LJ 3rd
, O'Brien PC. Risk factors for severity of diabetic polyneuropathy: Intensive longitudinal assessment of the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study cohort. Diabetes Care 1999;22:1479-86.
Dyck PJ, Davies JL, Clark VM, Litchy WJ, Dyck PJ, Klein CJ, et al.
Modeling chronic glycemic exposure variables as correlates and predictors of microvascular complications of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:2282-8.
Singleton JR, Smith AG, Bromberg MB. Increased prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance in patients with painful sensory neuropathy. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1448-53.
Dyck PJ, Kratz KM, Karnes JL, Litchy WJ, Klein R, Pach JM, et al.
The prevalence by staged severity of various types of diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy, and nephropathy in a population-based cohort: The Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study. Neurology 1993;43:817-24.
Tesfaye S, Chaturvedi N, Eaton SE, Ward JD, Manes C, Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, et al.
Vascular risk factors and diabetic neuropathy. N Engl J Med 2005;352:341-50.
Dyck PJ, Sinnreich M. Diabetic neuropathies. Continuum 2003;9:19-34.
Tesfaye S, Malik R, Harris N, Jakubowski JJ, Mody C, Rennie IG, et al.
Arterio-venous shunting and proliferating new vessels in acute painful neuropathy of rapid glycaemic control (insulin neuritis). Diabetologia 1996;39:329-35.
van Heel DA, Levitt NS, Winter TA. Diabetic neuropathic cachexia: The importance of positive recognition and early nutritional support. Int J Clin Pract 1998;52:591-2.
Rota E, Morelli N. Entrapment neuropathies in diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2016;7:342-53. doi:10.4239/wjd.v7.i17.342.
Watanabe K, Hagura R, Akanuma Y, Takasu T, Kajinuma H, Kuzuya N, et al.
Characteristics of cranial nerve palsies in diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1990;10:19-27.
Anandhanarayanan A, Teh K, Goonoo M, Tesfaye S, Selvarajah D. Diabetic neuropathies. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, Chrousos G, Herder W W de, Dhatariya K, editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA): MDText.com, Inc.; 2000. Available form: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279175/
. [Last updated on 2022 Mar 15].
Dyck PJ, Windebank AJ. Diabetic and nondiabetic lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathies: New insights into pathophysiology and treatment. Muscle Nerve 2002;25:477-91.
Boulton AJ, Armstrong DG, Albert SF, Frykberg RG, Hellman R, Kirkman MS, et al.
Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment: A report of the task force of the foot care interest group of the American Diabetes Association, with endorsement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1679-85.
Miller JD, Carter E, Shih J, Giovinco NA, Boulton AJ, Mills JL, et al.
How to do a 3-minute diabetic foot exam. J Fam Pract 2014;63:646-56.
Cornblath DR. Diabetic neuropathy: Diagnostic methods. Adv Stud Med 2004;4:S650-61.
Salvotelli L, Stoico V, Perrone F, Cacciatori V, Negri C, Brangani C, et al.
Prevalence of neuropathy in type 2 diabetic patients and its association with other diabetes complications: The Verona Diabetic Foot Screening Program. J Diabetes Complications 2015;29:1066-70.
Zhang Q, Yi N, Liu S, Zheng H, Qiao X, Xiong Q, et al.
Easier operation and similar power of 10 g monofilament test for screening diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Int Med Res 2018;46:3278-84.
Gylfadottir SS, Weeracharoenkul D, Andersen ST, Niruthisard S, Suwanwalaikorn S, Jensen TS. Painful and non-painful diabetic polyneuropathy: Clinical characteristics and diagnostic issues. J Diabetes Investig 2019;10:1148-57.
Ridehalgh C, Sandy-Hindmarch OP, Schmid AB. Validity of clinical small-fiber sensory testing to detect small-nerve fiber degeneration. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2018;48:767-74.
Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, et al.
Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: The IASP Classification of Chronic Pain for the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Pain 2019;160:19-27.
Finnerup NB, Haroutounian S, Kamerman P, Baron R, Bennett DL, Bouhassira D, et al
. Neuropathic pain: An updated grading system for research and clinical practice. Pain 2016;157:1599-606.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2013. Diabetes Care 2013;36 Suppl 1:S11-66.
Spallone V, Morganti R, D'Amato C, Greco C, Cacciotti L, Marfia GA. Validation of DN4 as a screening tool for neuropathic pain in painful diabetic polyneuropathy. Diabet Med 2012;29:578-85.
Bennett M. The LANSS Pain Scale: The Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs. Pain 2001;92:147-57.
Krause SJ, Backonja MM. Development of a neuropathic pain questionnaire. Clin J Pain 2003;19:306-14.
Portenoy R. Development and testing of a neuropathic pain screening questionnaire: ID Pain. Curr Med Res Opin 2006;22:1555-65.
Bouhassira D, Attal N, Fermanian J, Alchaar H, Gautron M, Masquelier E, et al.
Development and validation of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory. Pain 2004;108:248-57.
Hurst H, Bolton J. Assessing the clinical significance of change scores recorded on subjective outcome measures. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004;27:26-35.
Haefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J 2006;15:S17-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1044-x. Epub 2005 Dec 1. PMID: 16320034; PMCID: PMC3454549.
Azhary H, Farooq MU, Bhanushali M, Majid A, Kassab MY. Peripheral neuropathy: Differential diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 2010;81:887-92.
Reimer M, Forstenpointner J, Hartmann A, Otto JC, Vollert J, Gierthmühlen J, et al
. Sensory bedside testing: A simple stratification approach for sensory phenotyping. PAIN Rep 2020;5:e820.
Joint Task Force of the EFNS and the PNS. European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society Guideline on the use of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society. J Peripher Nerv Syst 2010;15:79-92.
Callaghan BC, Little AA, Feldman EL, Hughes RA. Enhanced glucose control for preventing and treating diabetic neuropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;6:CD007543.
The effect of intensive diabetes therapy on the development and progression of neuropathy. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:561-8.
Pop-Busui R, Lu J, Brooks MM, Albert S, Althouse AD, Escobedo J, et al.
Impact of glycemic control strategies on the progression of diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes (BARI 2D) Cohort. Diabetes Care 2013;36:3208-15.
Agudo R, Valls-Solé J, Recasens M, Fabregat N, Ricart MJ, Esmatjes E. Effects of kidney and pancreas transplantation on neurophysiological rates of polyneuropathy and autonomous cardiac function in diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease. Med Clin (Barc) 2002;118:534-8.
Kennedy WR, Navarro X, Goetz FC, Sutherland DE, Najarian JS. Effects of pancreatic transplantation on diabetic neuropathy. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1031-7.
Boucek P, Havrdova T, Voska L, Lodererova A, He L, Saudek F, et al.
Epidermal innervation in type 1 diabetic patients: A 2.5-year prospective study after simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation. Diabetes Care 2008;31:1611-2.
Fioretto P, Steffes MW, Sutherland DE, Goetz FC, Mauer M. Reversal of lesions of diabetic nephropathy after pancreas transplantation. N Engl J Med 1998;339:69-75.
Del Carro U, Fiorina P, Amadio S, De Toni Franceschini L, Petrelli A, Menini S, et al.
Evaluation of polyneuropathy markers in type 1 diabetic kidney transplant patients and effects of islet transplantation: Neurophysiological and skin biopsy longitudinal analysis. Diabetes Care 2007;30:3063-9.
Ziegler D, Nowak H, Kempler P, Vargha P, Low PA. Treatment of symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy with the antioxidant alpha-lipoic acid: A meta-analysis. Diabet Med 2004;21:114-21.
Dyck PJ, Norell JE, Tritschler H, Schuette K, Samigullin R, Ziegler D, et al.
Challenges in design of multicenter trials: End points assessed longitudinally for change and monotonicity. Diabetes Care 2007;30:2619-25.
Haupt E, Ledermann H, Köpcke W. Benfotiamine in the treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy – A three-week randomized, controlled pilot study (BEDIP study). Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;43:71-7.
Stracke H, Gaus W, Achenbach U, Federlin K, Bretzel RG. Benfotiamine in diabetic polyneuropathy (BENDIP): Results of a randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2008;116:600-5.
Hotta N, Akanuma Y, Kawamori R, Matsuoka K, Oka Y, Shichiri M, et al
. Long-term clinical effects of epalrestat, an aldose reductase inhibitor, on diabetic peripheral neuropathy: the 3-year, multicenter, comparative Aldose Reductase Inhibitor-Diabetes Complications Trial. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1538-44. doi: 10.2337/dc05-2370. PMID: 16801576.
Malik RA, Tesfaye S, Ziegler D. Medical strategies to reduce amputation in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2013;30:893-900.
Rajamani K, Colman PG, Li LP, Best JD, Voysey M, D'Emden MC, et al.
Effect of fenofibrate on amputation events in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (FIELD study): A prespecified analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;373:1780-8.
Dworkin RH, Backonja M, Rowbotham MC, Allen RR, Argoff CR, Bennett GJ, et al.
Advances in neuropathic pain: Diagnosis, mechanisms, and treatment recommendations. Arch Neurol 2003;60:1524-34.
Erlich DR, Bodine W. Tapentadol (nucynta) for treatment of pain [published correction appears in Am Fam Physician 2012;86:8]. Am Fam Physician 2012;85:910-1.
Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Audette J, Baron R, Gourlay GK, Haanpää ML, et al.
Recommendations for the pharmacological management of neuropathic pain: An overview and literature update. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:S3-14.
Cohen K, Shinkazh N, Frank J, Israel I, Fellner C. Pharmacological treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. P
Bonnet U, Scherbaum N. How addictive are gabapentin and pregabalin? A systematic review. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2017;27:1185-215.
Eli Lilly and Company [Internet]. CYMBALTA® Prescribing Information. Indianapolis, Indiana:Eli Lilly and Company; 2014. Available from: http://pi.lilly.com/us/cymbalta-pi.pdf
. [Last accessed on 2022 Mar 18].
Boulton AJ. Management of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Clin Diabetes 2005;23:9-15.
Rowbotham MC, Goli V, Kunz NR, Lei D. Venlafaxine extended release in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Pain 2004;110:697-706.
Huizinga MM, Peltier A. Painful diabetic neuropathy: A management-centered review. Clin Diabetes 2007;25:6-15.
Baron R, Mayoral V, Leijon G, Binder A, Steigerwald I, Serpell M. 5% lidocaine medicated plaster versus pregabalin in post-herpetic neuralgia and diabetic polyneuropathy: An open-label, non-inferiority two-stage RCT study. Curr Med Res Opin 2009;25:1663-76.
Wong MC, Chung JW, Wong TK. Effects of treatments for symptoms of painful diabetic neuropathy: Systematic review. BMJ 2007;335:87.
Argoff CE. Topical analgesics in the management of acute and chronic pain. Mayo Clin Proc 2013;88:195-205.
Sindrup SH, Gram LF, Brøsen K, Eshøj O, Mogensen EF. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine is effective in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy symptoms. Pain 1990;42:135-44.
Sindrup SH, Bjerre U, Dejgaard A, Brøsen K, Aaes-Jørgensen T, Gram LF. The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram relieves the symptoms of diabetic neuropathy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992;52:547-52.
Bril V, England J, Franklin GM, Backonja M, Cohen J, Del Toro D, et al
. Evidence-based guideline: Treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology 2011;76:1758-65.
Wiffen PJ, Derry S, Moore RA, Kalso EA. Carbamazepine for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;2014:CD005451.
Spallone V, Lacerenza M, Rossi A, Sicuteri R, Marchettini P. Painful diabetic polyneuropathy: Approach to diagnosis and management. Clin J Pain 2012;28:726-43.
Lunn MP, Hughes RA, Wiffen PJ. Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014:CD007115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007115.pub3. PMID: 24385423.
Ziegler D, Fonseca V. From guideline to patient: A review of recent recommendations for pharmacotherapy of painful diabetic neuropathy. J Diabetes Complications 2015;29:146-56.
Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, McNicol E, Baron R, Dworkin RH, et al.
Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2015;14:162-73.
Tanenberg RJ, Irving GA, Risser RC, Ahl J, Robinson MJ, Skljarevski V, et al.
Duloxetine, pregabalin, and duloxetine plus gabapentin for diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain management in patients with inadequate pain response to gabapentin: An open-label, randomized, noninferiority comparison. Mayo Clin Proc 2011;86:615-26.
Vieweg WV, Wood MA, Fernandez A, Beatty-Brooks M, Hasnain M, Pandurangi AK. Proarrhythmic risk with antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs: Implications in the elderly. Drugs Aging 2009;26:997-1012.
Allen R, Sharma U, Barlas S. Clinical experience with desvenlafaxine in treatment of pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. J Pain Res 2014;7:339-51.
Griebeler ML, Morey-Vargas OL, Brito JP, Tsapas A, Wang Z, Carranza Leon BG, et al.
Pharmacologic interventions for painful diabetic neuropathy: An umbrella systematic review and comparative effectiveness network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2014;161:639-49.
Dubinsky RM, Miyasaki J. Assessment: Efficacy of transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation in the treatment of pain in neurologic disorders (an evidence-based review): Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2010;74:173-6.
Finnerup NB, Sindrup SH, Jensen TS. The evidence for pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain. Pain 2010;150:573-81.
Wernicke JF, Pritchett YL, D'Souza DN, Waninger A, Tran P, Iyengar S, et al.
A randomized controlled trial of duloxetine in diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Neurology 2006;67:1411-20.
Quilici S, Chancellor J, Löthgren M, Simon D, Said G, Le TK, et al.
Meta-analysis of duloxetine vs. pregabalin and gabapentin in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. BMC Neurol 2009;9:6.
Kaur H, Hota D, Bhansali A, Dutta P, Bansal D, Chakrabarti A. A comparative evaluation of amitriptyline and duloxetine in painful diabetic neuropathy: A randomized, double-blind, cross-over clinical trial. Diabetes Care 2011;34:818-22.
Max MB, Lynch SA, Muir J, Shoaf SE, Smoller B, Dubner R. Effects of desipramine, amitriptyline, and fluoxetine on pain in diabetic neuropathy. N Engl J Med 1992;326:1250-6.
Bansal D, Bhansali A, Hota D, Chakrabarti A, Dutta P. Amitriptyline vs. pregabalin in painful diabetic neuropathy: A randomized double blind clinical trial. Diabet Med 2009;26:1019-26.
Morello CM, Leckband SG, Stoner CP, Moorhouse DF, Sahagian GA. Randomized double-blind study comparing the efficacy of gabapentin with amitriptyline on diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain. Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1931-7.
Argoff CE, Backonja MM, Belgrade MJ, Bennett GJ, Clark MR, Cole BE, et al.
Consensus guidelines: Treatment planning and options. Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Mayo Clin Proc 2006;81:S12-25.
Bril V, England J, Franklin GM, Backonja M, Cohen J, Del Toro D, et al
. American Academy of Neurology; American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine; American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Evidence-based guideline: Treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy: report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Neurology 2011 17;76:1758-65. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182166ebe.
Tesfaye S, Vileikyte L, Rayman G, Sindrup SH, Perkins BA, Baconja M, et al.
Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Consensus recommendations on diagnosis, assessment and management. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011;27:629-38.
Ziegler D. Painful diabetic neuropathy: Advantage of novel drugs over old drugs? Diabetes Care 2009;32 Suppl 2:S414-9.
Vinik AI, Casellini CM. Guidelines in the management of diabetic nerve pain: Clinical utility of pregabalin. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2013;6:57-78.
Bouhassira D, Wilhelm S, Schacht A, Perrot S, Kosek E, Cruccu G, et al.
Neuropathic pain phenotyping as a predictor of treatment response in painful diabetic neuropathy: Data from the randomized, double-blind, COMBO-DN study. Pain 2014;155:2171-9.
Baron R, Maier C, Attal N, Binder A, Bouhassira D, Cruccu G, et al.
Peripheral neuropathic pain: A mechanism-related organizing principle based on sensory profiles. Pain 2017;158:261-72.
Demant DT, Lund K, Vollert J, Maier C, Segerdahl M, Finnerup NB, et al.
The effect of oxcarbazepine in peripheral neuropathic pain depends on pain phenotype: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phenotype-stratified study. Pain 2014;155:2263-73.
Wasner G, Kleinert A, Binder A, Schattschneider J, Baron R. Postherpetic neuralgia: Topical lidocaine is effective in nociceptor-deprived skin. J Neurol 2005;252:677-86.
Kumar D, Marshall HJ. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Amelioration of pain with transcutaneous electrostimulation. Diabetes Care 1997;20:1702-5.
Hamza MA, White PF, Craig WF, Ghoname ES, Ahmed HE, Proctor TJ, et al.
Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: A novel analgesic therapy for diabetic neuropathic pain. Diabetes Care 2000;23:365-70.
Petersen EA, Stauss TG, Scowcroft JA, Brooks ES, White JL, Sills SM, et al.
Effect of high-frequency (10-kHz) spinal cord stimulation in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2021;78:687-98.
Berger AA, Liu Y, Possoit H, Rogers AC, Moore W, Gress K, et al.
Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) and chronic pain. Anesth Pain Med 2021;11:e113020.
Burke TJ. 5 Questions-and answers-about MIRE treatment. Adv Skin Wound Care 2003;16:369-71.
Kochman AB, Carnegie DH, Burke TJ. Symptomatic reversal of peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2002;92:125-30.
Leonard DR, Farooqi MH, Myers S. Restoration of sensation, reduced pain, and improved balance in subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study with monochromatic near-infrared treatment. Diabetes Care 2004;27:168-72.
McGowan E, Hoyt SB, Li X, Lyons KA, Abbadie C. A peripherally acting Na(v)1.7 sodium channel blocker reverses hyperalgesia and allodynia on rat models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. Anesth Analg 2009;109:951-8.
Rice AS, Dworkin RH, McCarthy TD, Anand P, Bountra C, McCloud PI, et al.
EMA401, an orally administered highly selective angiotensin II type 2 receptor antagonist, as a novel treatment for postherpetic neuralgia: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial. Lancet 2014;383:1637-47.
Sanford M. Intrathecal ziconotide: A review of its use in patients with chronic pain refractory to other systemic or intrathecal analgesics. CNS Drugs 2013;27:989-1002.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]