Background: An early initiation of statins in the diabetes population helps in prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, there is a paucity of data on its use in young Indian patients with diabetes. This survey report aimed to provide opinion-based recommendations for pragmatic usage of statin in diabetes population of India. Material and Methods: Discussion and virtual survey (a questionnaire of 18 questions) was conducted at 16 round table meetings (RTMs) which included participation of health-care practitioners (HCPs) from India. On the basis of their opinions and discussion, general recommendations about early usage of statins in diabetes for prevention of ASCVD were derived. Results: Out of 261 HCPs participated, 56.1% recommended initiating statins in patients aged 41–50 years irrespective of their total/low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Among people with diabetes aged between 20 and 39 years, 38.9% of HCPs considered LDL-C >100 mg/dL and 77% of HCPs considered history of ASCVD as a risk factor for early statin initiation. Overall, 98.9% of HCPs agreed that early initiation of statin in people with diabetes and ASCVD risk factors will help reduce ASCVD. The majority of HCPs recommended initiating moderate-intensity (51.2%) and low-intensity (43.8%) statins and assess every 3 months for tolerance and compliance in people with diabetes (aged 20–39 years) and additional ASCVD risk factors. The use of rosuvastatin (78.5% of HCPs) was preferred for early initiation in people with diabetes. Majority of HCPs agreed (57.3%) or strongly agreed (36.2%) that rosuvastatin has more clinical utility compared to other statins due to better LDL-C-lowering effect and other pleiotropic effects. Physician's inertia limits the effective use of statins among young adults with diabetes (55.8%), and 65.8% of HCPs recommended screening of people with diabetes for additional ASCVD risk factors. Conclusion: The participating HCPs opined that early initiation of statin therapy in people with diabetes and ASCVD risk factors will help reduce ASCVD. Rosuvastatin is mostly recommended for early initiation of statin therapy among the diabetes population for prevention of ASCVD. There is a necessity of using a proactive approach to screen for additional ASCVD risk factors in young individuals with diabetes and further increase the awareness about benefits of initiating statin therapy from an early stage.

Background: Management of glucose levels in patients with diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is challenging. There are various factors contributing to glycemic variability (GV), including altered metabolism of glucose and insulin in the ESRD stage. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system measures glucose levels continuously and helps to study the glucose profile of patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). This pilot study aimed to analyze the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) of type 2 diabetes patients with ESRD undergoing HD and study the GV when patients were on HD (referred to as ON days) versus when patients were not on HD (referred as OFF days). Materials and Methods: We enrolled 10 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and ESRD undergoing maintenance HD in the study. Data regarding patient characteristics, including age, gender, duration of diabetes mellitus, HbA1c, and serum fructosamine, were collected. The AGP data obtained by the CGM sensor on the HD ON days was compared to AGP data on HD OFF days. Results: There was a significant linear correlation of CGM-derived average blood glucose with HbA1c value; however, the association was not significant with fructosamine level. The CGM-derived average glucose level was significantly lower during HD ON days compared to HD OFF days, difference being 29.9 mg/dl (−33.7, −26.0; P < 0.001), whereas GV was significantly higher during HD OFF days compared to ON days. Conclusion: The variation in the glucose levels was higher during the HD OFF days compared to HD ON days. Future AGP studies recruiting more number of patients on HD will help better understand the clinical impact of glucose profile and GV in ESRD patients.

Up to 40% of patients undergoing elective surgeries have underlying diabetes mellitus (DM), and therefore an elevated risk of perioperative adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Preoperative cardiovascular risk assessment and therapeutic optimization are warranted in all patients with DM. This is an updated review on preoperative evaluation of cardiac risk in patients with DM undergoing surgery and strategies to minimize the risk. This article summarizes the current evidence and recommendations for cardiac evaluation in DM before noncardiac surgery. Preoperative risk estimation includes risk stratification of the proposed surgery and estimating the risk in the patient using available risk calculators such as the Revised Cardiac Risk Index and assessment of the functional status of the patient in terms of metabolic equivalents of tasks. Preoperative cardiac investigations such as electrocardiogram, echocardiography, stress testing, or cardiac biomarkers should be done in high-risk surgeries, and in certain subsets of patients undergoing low- or intermediate-risk surgeries. Additional testing and preoperative optimization are warranted in patients with heart failure and reduced or preserved ejection fraction, those with cardiac autonomic neuropathy, hypertension with or without end-organ damage, and patients undergoing transplant surgery, all of which are discussed in the current review.

Background: There is a lack of consensus regarding efficacy and cardiovascular (CV) safety of testosterone-replacement therapy (TRT) in men with late-onset hypogonadism (LOH) secondary to obesity ±type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This is because of limited number of prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in this cohort. Methods: A comprehensive retrospective review of medical literature was carried out using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework to assess the CV outcomes and safety of TRT in men with LOH. The review included scientific publications from January 2000 to July 2021, which included men with obesity ± T2DM. Results: Out of the 723 publications, which were identified on preliminary screening, 154 conformed to broad inclusion criteria for this systematic review of literature. Out of these 154 publications, 34 studies with a total number of 4,365,684 patients were finally included for this systematic review (9 randomized controlled trials, 6 meta-analyses and 19 observational studies). Studies investigating whether TRT offers protection against CV disease (CVD) and stroke generally concluded that the use of Testosterone (T) in middle-aged to elderly men has no detrimental impact on their CV risk. Older men with T2DM, obesity and metabolic syndrome are likely to benefit from TRT, as several studies point to an improvement in insulin sensitivity, markers of inflammation, time to Angina, CV risk, CV mortality, and even all-cause mortality. Conclusions: This retrospective systematic review of the literature, suggests modest efficacy of TRT in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality in men with LOH secondary to obesity and/or T2DM. TRT was associated with an increased risk of overall CVDs and MACE only when T preparations were given at supratherapeutic dosage or when TRT was offered to frail men. The findings of the current review could not confirm TRT as a cause of adverse CV events.

Emphysematous urinary tract infections (UTIs) are lower or upper UTIs associated with gas formation. Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is a rare disease but is highly prevalent in patients with diabetes and even higher among female patients with diabetes. Earlier, the mortality rate of EPN was 60%–80%, but now, it has been reduced to 20% to 25% due to the availability of good antimicrobial agents and timely treatment. Our objective of this article is to elucidate the pathogenesis of EPN including gas-forming mechanism; discuss clinical features, radiological classification, and prognostic factors; in addition, compare the modalities of management of EPN and outcome among the various radiological classes.